![]() ![]() An aortic dissection is classified according to its anatomical location and time from onset. We found no significant difference in the primary outcome following the use of different antihypertensive medication regimes.Īn aortic dissection is a life-threatening condition that is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality in both the developed and developing countries worldwide. ![]() Patients treated with different treatment strategies did not have a significantly increased risk of a primary outcome compared with those treated with a monotherapy. Over 80% of patients received dual or triple antihypertensive strategies. Study endpoints mostly occurred within 6 months after the index date. The most common comorbidity was hypertension followed by dyslipidemia and diabetes mellitus. We included 106 patients with a mean follow-up period of 2.75 years. The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and hospital admission for an aortic dissection. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate outcomes in different antihypertensive strategies. We reviewed the hospital records of patients with TBAD at a medical center in Taiwan from January 2008 to June 2013 to assess the baseline information, prescribing pattern, event rate, and clinical effectiveness of different antihypertensive treatment strategies. This retrospective cohort study evaluated antihypertensive prescription patterns and outcomes in patients with nonsurgical TBAD. However, the use of medication to treat it remains unclear in our population, particularly in patients with a type B aortic dissection (TBAD) who do not receive surgery. Aortic dissection is a life-threatening condition. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |